WHITSUNDAY 2008

“And they continued stedfastly in the apostles’ doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers” (Acts 2.42).  In nomine Patris...

Prayers.  When we think of prayer, we might consider set prayers such as we have in our Book of Common Prayer.  We might also think of our personal prayers, which hopefully are a balance of adoration, thanksgiving, confession and supplication; but, which I suspect for most of us are more in the supplication part, “Dear God, please heal Aunt Polly of the dreadful cancer which has struck her down.”  Lastly, and sadly neglected, there is the practice of mental prayer in which, after “tuning in to God” and seeking His inspiriation by doing something like saying or singing a hymn such as our Communion hymn today, “Come Holy Ghost, our souls inspire”, and then quieting the noise in our minds, we meditate on a particular passage of Scripture without necessarily forming any words, but rather by visualizing ourselves being present.  We might think of the feeding of the 5,000; or of Jesus before Pilate; or of our Lord’s Crucifixion; or of sitting at Jesus’ feet on the mountainside while He said the beatitudes from the Sermon on the Mount.  From such meditation, we should acknowledge our shortcomings, and seek, with God’s assistance, to replace those vices with virtues – combining the efforts of our weak and faulty wills with the perfect will of God to move ever so slightly and slowly in that direction.

Our Lesson for today, Whitsunday, the Feast of Pentecost is, not surprisingly, the wondrous event as recorded by Luke for us in Chapter 2 of the Acts of the Apostles, often referred to as the birthday of the Christian Church.  While it might be as good a choice as any other New Testament episode for meditation on in mental prayer, before I pondered what is to be learned in terms of my own sanctification, I might rather have been moved to ask myself, “How would I have reacted to such an event?” 

Among the things that we should note from that passage is the presence of a strong wind (“a mighty rushing wind”) and of tongues of fire which “sat upon each of them”.  Wind and fire were ancient symbols of power.  Recall the times: of the Breath of God, moving over the waters at the beginning of creation; of breathing life into lifeless clay; of the Breath of God in the valley of dry bones in Ezekiel.  Likewise, the pillar of fire by night which led the Israelites during their sojourn in the wilderness after the Exodus from Egypt; the fire from heaven that consumed all that Elijah had prepared in his confrontation with the prophets of Baal; the chariots of fire surrounding Elisha and so forth.

I suspect that the Apostles were not expecting either of these signs; but, when they did appear, they may possibly have recalled what Jesus had said to them 10 days earlier, just prior to His Ascension and as we heard read on the Feast of the Ascension, “But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you” (Acts1.8a).  Whether they may have recalled these words of our Lord before they began to exhibit the quite unexpected signs of the Divine presence within them, we can only speculate.

And surely here is what is equally important about the episode, at least as important that the Apostles began to speak in languages other than their own.  If we read the entire verse of Chapter 1 - our Lord’s last words prior to His Ascension according to St. Luke, we hear what is to be the purpose of the power that is to be given them on the Day of Pentecost, “But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto Me both in Jerusalem, and in Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost parts of the earth.”

Now to be sure, on that particular day in Jerusalem, that the disciples did begin to speak the “wonderful works of God” in a variety of foreign languages is what got the attention of a large group of some proselytes, but mostly visiting Jews from various nations to which they had been scattered and had learned to speak the various local non-Hebrew languages which we hear listed for us in today’s Lesson.  And, even moreso, to be sure, the Divine Presence, as manifested first in the rushing mighty wind and tongues of fire was clearly the source of the ecstatic spiritual experience with its subsequent manifestation in the Apostles themselves of glorious visions expressed in a bewildering multitude of languages.

What a spectacularly appropriate way for the Christian Church to be born.

Now to be very honest, when we read the rest of Acts, and the pastoral Epistles, it is quite clear that subsequently, their being “witnesses unto Jesus … unto the uttermost parts of the world” which caused the rapid growth of the nascent Church was not done by speaking in languages foreign to themselves.  They preached plainly and simply about Jesus and His Resurrection; previously cowardly and marginally faithful men were given the power as provided by our Lord to be steadfast witnesses of the Way, the Truth and the Life.  Indeed, immediately upon this manifestation, when they were accused of being drunk, St. Peter preached what is often styled as the first Christian sermon, and it was remarkably direct, frank and uncomplicated by further strange manifestations – except of course, that it precipitated the Baptism of 3,000 converts on the spot.

Throughout the history of the Christian Church, including even the Apostolic age, there have been groups of believers who have insisted that this peculiar gift of speaking foreign languages is not just a  normal, but a necessary mark of the Christian experience.  “If you don’t speak in tongues, you’re not a real Christian.”  Bishop Mercer was wont to observe on occasion that there are many people who are just plain wired that way; for them, real Christianity must be an experience of overwhelming emotional fervour and ecstatic experience.

For such people, the subtleties of doctrine, the nature of the relationship of the Three Persons of the Holy Trinity (which Fr. Peter will explain to us next Sunday), the form of the settled institution of the Church and her hierarchical ministry are seen as massive impediments to what should be the true expression of Christianity.  In contrast, they hold that “freedom of Spirit” is paramount, by which it often seems that they mean the absolute authority of one’s own feelings and personal opinions.

However, Pentecost is not just about ecstatic experience with manifestations of an extraordinary gift of God the Holy Spirit.  The Spirit of God is a Spirit of order, not of chaos.  If an individual’s spiritual life is not nurtured, and formed, and shaped under the influence of clarity of doctrine in the settled institution of the Church with her regular and ordered forms of worship, then the danger of chaos is very great indeed.  At the end of the very Chapter in question, after St. Peter’s sermon, St. Luke tells us that, “they continued stedfastly in the apostles’ doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers”. 

In actual fact, for reasons of which I am unaware, the translators of the King James dropped what I should think is a rather important definite article at the very end of that sentence.  The Greek of the Textus Receptus states, “... in breaking of bread, and in the prayers.”  “The prayers”, not just “prayers” as the King James has it, being of course the regular prayers that the very earliest Christian Church had inherited from synagogue and Temple worship.  The dropping of that article might lead many to understand that there were no regular, ordered, preformulated prayers in the early Church, rather just spontaneous prayer, so why should there be ordered prayer now?

This ordered form of worship was so far as we know, and in spite of contentions otherwise, the norm of the early Christian Church.  Many like to cite 1 Cor. 14, with St. Paul’s thoughts about “speaking in tongues” in church, as further proof on top of our passage from Acts, that this particular gift is a necessary part of any true Christian’s makeup.  However, if one reads that entire chapter, it is abundantly clear that St. Paul was attempting to reel in what had become a chaotic form of worship in Corinth.  He pretty much discourages the Corinthians from allowing anyone to exhibit that gift in public if there is no one to interpret – as there was on the Day of Pentecost.  And he closes off this chapter on instructions for corporate worship with this phrase that surely must have been Fr. Palmer’s inspiration for the title of his priest/server/altar guild manual “Readiness and Decency”, “let everything be done decently and in order.”

It is certainly no secret that our TAC form of worship is one of fairly controlled decency and order as St. Paul exhorts, not unlike we understand that the early Church generally practised; but, what if our little church were suddenly to be filled with a rushing mighty wind and tongues of fire just as unexpectedly as on that first Pentecost of the Christian Church were to descend on Peter and Louise and George and Agatha, and they all began to speak in Mandarin, Portugese, Cree and Russian?  Well, certainly Doug Ellis and Dr. Henry could translate for us; but what would be our reaction otherwise?

ANNUNCIATION     OTTAWA       2008    +CR